Is it a Control Deficiency, Significant Deficiency, or Material Weakness?
Classification matters as much as the issue itself. Walk through 12 questions about likelihood and magnitude. Get a recommended classification with PCAOB AS 2201 + Reg S-K Item 308 citations + suggested remediation memo language.
Email me the full report + the monthly From the Filing Seat note
Get the monthly From the Filing Seat note: one practical SEC/GAAP insight from the filing seat. No spam.
Keep this. Track it every quarter.
Want this saved, connected to your data, and tracked quarter over quarter? That is the premium version, inside Unfolding Equity, one flat $720/month for the whole company. This free tool stays fully usable, always.
Honest limits: This classifier is a guide, not a determination. PCAOB AS 2201.A1-A14 requires professional judgment combining quantitative + qualitative factors. The tool uses keyword-matched proxies for likelihood and magnitude. These CANNOT replace your auditor's judgment, written technical accounting memo, or audit committee review. How the scoring works: the numeric cut-offs (e.g., a higher total combined with high-magnitude/high-likelihood answers steers toward Material Weakness, a moderate total toward Significant Deficiency) are a heuristic approximation of the AS 2201 likelihood × magnitude framework, not bright-line rules in the standard. A confirmed restatement of previously issued financials always overrides the score and points to a Material Weakness, consistent with SEC Reg S-K Item 308. The exact thresholds are calibrated by us and should be treated as directional only. Final classification requires professional judgment. Use as first-pass framework. Final classification must be made with your audit firm. For senior review: Reach out.